检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《数量经济技术经济研究》2011年第5期37-50,共14页Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年项目(08JC790073);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71073109)的资助
摘 要:本文构建多维度益贫式增长(Pro—Poor Growth)度量方法,对中国是否实现多维度益贫式增长进行实证度量,将益贫式增长的潜在来源分解为经济增长、社会收入初次分配和再分配三部分,并将促进多维度益贫式增长的政策划分为促进社会收入再分配和初次分配政策。研究表明,1981~2005年中国在部分年份实现了收入维度益贫式增长;而在教育、医疗以及综合福利维度未实现益贫式增长。影响因素不是社会收入再分配和收入增长,而是社会收入初次分配。教育人力资本、社会保障对益贫式增长有一定影响但不显著。This paper intends to construct multi - dimensional model to measure pro - poor growth, which will make a judgement on whether China has achieved pro -poor growth in multi - dimensional perspective, and also it will decompose po- tential source of the pro- poor growth into three parts including economic growth, the first distribution of social income and redistribution of social income. Empirical study finds that the contribution degree of the policy to pro - poor growth is positive in some years from 1981 to 2005. However, education, healthcare and comprehensive welfare policy are not effective on achieving pro - poor growth. The effective factor of pro - poor growth is independent of redistribution of social income and income growth, but initial distribution of social income has such effects. Education investment of human capital and social security has slight effects but not very sig- nificant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249