检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省五华县人民医院骨科,广东五华514400
出 处:《中国中医药咨讯》2011年第14期41-41,40,共2页
摘 要:目的对应用中医综合治疗方法与普通治疗方法治疗克雷式骨折的疗效比较。方法L将2006年6月至2009年5月期间90例克雷氏骨折随机分成对照组45例和治疗组45例,对照组复位加石膏外固定,治疗组复位加小夹板固定配合内服外用中药,再结合传统手法治疗。结果:对照组总有效率75.5%。治疗组总有效率93.3%。结论:治疗组复住加小夹板固定配合内服外用中药,再结合传统手法治疗的疗效比复位加石膏外固定的效果好。AIM:To evaluate and compare the outcome of Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) combined treatment and general treatment of Clay-type fracture. METHODS: from June 2006 to May 2009,90 clay-type fracture patients were treated with TCM combined treatment(45 patients) and general treatment(45 patients).the control group of patients which take the general treatment were treated by reseting and piaster external fixation.the treatment group of patients which take the TCM combined treatment were treated by resting ,fixed with splint and taking TCM combined medicine. RESULTS: Effective rate of the control group was 75.5 % and the treatment group was 93.3 %. CONCLUSION: the effect of treatment group was better than the other group.
分 类 号:R683.410.5[医药卫生—骨科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222