检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《江苏医药》2011年第10期1173-1174,共2页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较局部麻醉和硬膜外麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术的效果。方法 120例腹股沟疝无张力修补患者随机均分为局部麻醉(A组)和硬膜外麻醉(B组)两组,对两组的手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后伤口疼痛、术后尿潴留、麻醉满意率和住院费用等进行比较研究。结果 A组在手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后尿潴留、住院费用等方面均优于B组(P<0.05)。结论局部麻醉下施行无张力疝修补术具有操作简单、患者痛苦小、恢复快、手术并发症少、住院时间短及住院费用低等优点。Objective To compare the outcomes of tension-free inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia and epidural blockade.Methods A total of 120 case was operated for tension-free hernioplasty with mesh-plug made of PP,of whom 60 cases were given local anesthesia(group A) and the other 60 cases were treated with epidural blockade.The operation time,postoperative time staying in bed,wound pain,urine retention,satisfactory rate for anesthesia and medical costs were recorded and compared between two groups.Results Compared to group B,group A had shorter operation time,shorter postoperative time staying in bed,less postoperative complications such as retention of urine,and lower medical costs.Conclusion Tension-free inguinal hernia neoplasty under local anaethesia has the advantages of simple procedure,well toleration,minimal invasion,low risk of complications,shorter hospital stay and low medical costs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222