检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡立德[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江传媒学院新闻与传播学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2011年第3期132-138,共7页Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
摘 要:深度报道是新闻传播界的一个热门话题,目前有"报道体裁说"、"报道方式说"、"报道理念说"和"报道形态说"等多种认识,这些认识的普遍特点是缺乏历史与逻辑的视角,对深度报道的解读难免存在盲点和误区;从历史角度看,深度报道特指解释性报道,后在实践中又增加了其他一些报道形式,最终发展演变成为一种新闻理念,而从逻辑上,学者们普遍认为的深度报道的体裁形式,与深度报道之间不都是必然关系,还存在一种或然关系。In-depth Reporting is a hot subject in the realm of news media.Currently the cognitive focus on this type of reporting ranges from genre,modes,philosophy,and forms,etc.However,all these different perspectives suffer from a lack of historical and logical awareness,leading to blind spots and misinterpretations in our understanding of In-depth Reporting.Historically In-depth Reporting referred specifically to interpretive reporting,but over time,with a number of additions in practice,it developed into a notion in news media.Logically,it has become an academic consensus that the relationship between In-depth Reporting and its generic modes is not always one of necessity,but is contingent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28