检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李双凤[1,2] 王亚平[1] 王丹[1] 肖艳英[1] 吕静[1]
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅二医院麻醉科,长沙410011 [2]海南省人民医院麻醉科,海口570311
出 处:《中国现代手术学杂志》2011年第2期148-151,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
摘 要:目的比较布托啡诺复合芬太尼与曲马多复合芬太尼用于全麻术后病人自控镇痛的效果及不良反应。方法 60例择期乳腺癌根治术行全身麻醉患者,随机分为两组,每组30例:A组为布托啡诺配伍芬太尼组,B组为曲马多配伍芬太尼组。记录并比较术后4、8、16、24、48 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue pain scale,VAS)、舒适度评分(Bruggman comfort score,BCS)及Ramsay镇静评分及不良反应。结果两组术后镇痛效果VAS评分和自主按压次数相比均无统计学差异(P>0.05);A组术后4、8、16、24 h BCS及Ramsay镇静评分明显高于B组(P<0.05),其恶心呕吐及皮肤瘙痒发生率均明显低于B组(P<0.05)。结论布托啡诺复合芬太尼镇痛效果确切,不良反应较少,是全麻术后镇痛治疗的良好选择之一。Objective To compare the clinical effect and safety between butorphanol combined with fentanyl and tramadol with fentanyl after general anesthesia.Methods 60 patients received general anesthesia during selective radical mastectomy,with ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ,were randomly divided into two groups with 30 cases for each.The butorphanol combined with fentanyl or tramadol combined with fentanyl were used in group A and B respectively.The visual analogue scale(VAS),Brugmann comfort score(BCS),Ramsay sedative score and side effects were recorded and compared between two groups within 48 hours after the operation.Results There was no significant difference in VAS and the times of self-compression between two groups(P0.05).BCS and Ramsay score of group A was significantly higher than those of group B at 4,8,16 and 24 hours after operation(P0.05).The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV) and pruritus of group A was significantly lower than those of group B(P0.05).Conclusion The use of butorphanol combined with fentanyl has a good effect of analgesia and fewer adverse reaction in patients-controlled analgesia after general anesthesia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222