检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐国良[1] 朱建新[1] 冯福才[1] 陈村龙[1] 智发朝[1] 周丹[1] 万田漠[1] 张万岱[1]
机构地区:[1]第一军医大学南方医院消化科,广州510515
出 处:《中华消化内镜杂志》1999年第4期210-212,共3页Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
摘 要:目的 比较手术和气囊扩张治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的疗效。方法 对 48 例患者(手术18 例,气囊扩张 30 例)进行了一年以上的随访观察,通过对临床症状, X 线钡餐食管造影,胃镜检查和食管24 小时连续p H 监测等进行比较分析。结果 手术和气囊扩张治疗食管贲门失弛缓症在以上几个方面差异均无显著性。结论 手术和气囊扩张均是治疗食管贲门失弛缓症安全有效的方法。而气囊扩张由于其方法简单,不必住院,费用较低等更适合我国国情。Objective The therapeutic effect of achalasia treated by either cardiac myotomy or balloon dilatation were contrasted. Methods A series of 48 consecutive patients with achalasia were categorized on their own will into teams receiving myotomy (n=18) or balloon dilatation (n=30) .All were followed up >1 year in terms of clinical manifestation ,radiography,gastroscopy and dynamic pH tests.The data were treated statistically. Results No significant difference was found between them regarding above terms. Conclusion The two measures are both effective for achalasia ,whereas balloon dilation seems more favorable for the victim,can be managed as out patient with less complication and expenses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249