检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2011年第16期24-26,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨循证护理干预对肾病综合征(NS)患儿疗效及生活质量的影响。方法将98例NS患儿随机分成对照组48例和干预组50例,对照组入院后采取常规护理,干预组患者在常规护理基础上予循证护理干预。比较2组患儿平均住院时间、疗效及生活质量。结果干预组患儿的平均住院时间较对照组明显缩短,干预组治疗效果明显优于对照组。干预组患儿生活质量较对照组明显改善。结论循证护理干预能明显提高肾病综合征患儿的治疗效果,进一步提高生活质量。Objective To investigate the influence of evidence-based nursing intervention on treatment effect and quality of life in nephrotic syndrome children. Methods 98 cases were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group. The control group received routine nursing and the intervention group additionally received evidence-based nursing intervention. We compared the average hospital stay, treatment effect and quality of life in two groups. Results The average hospital stay in the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group. The treatment effect in the intervention group was ameliorated than that of the control group. The quality of life in the intervention group was ameliorated than that of the control group. Conclusions Evidence-based nursing intervention could obviously improve the treatment effect and quality of life in children with nephrotic syndrome.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28