老年轻度认知障碍患者生活高危因素探讨(英文)  被引量:11

Exploration of High Risk Factors in Lifestyle for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly People

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:于焕清[1] 郭宗君[1] 王晓林[1] 邢昂[1] 章政[1] 贾秀娟[1] 毛拥军[1] 杨乃龙[1] 

机构地区:[1]干部病房青岛大学医学院附属医院,山东266003

出  处:《现代生物医学进展》2011年第10期1885-1890,共6页Progress in Modern Biomedicine

基  金:Shandong Provincial Science and Technology Foundation(22130109);National "Eleventh Five-Year" Technology Support Program(2006BAI02B01);Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology Foundation(Kzd-03,09-1-1-33-nsh)~~

摘  要:目的:探讨生活高危因素对老年轻度认知障碍的影响。方法:应用简明精神状态量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知测验量表(MoCA)、临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)和生活高危因素量表对219例老年人进行调查,分析生活高危因素对老年轻度认知障碍的影响。结果:女性患MCI风险高于男性(P=0.03);文盲组患MCI风险高于小学组,小学组高于初中及以上组(P=0.00);农民组患MCI风险高于工人组,工人组高于管理人员组(P=0.01);农村居民患MCI风险高于城市居民(P=0.01);运动影响MCI发病,不运动组患MCI风险高于运动组(P=0.00),运动频率<4次/周高于运动频率≥4次/周(P=0.00),运动年数≤10年组高于运动>10年组(P=0.01);业余爱好影响MCI发病,无业余爱好组患MCI风险高于有业余爱好组(P=0.00),业余爱好史≤10年组高于业余爱好史>10组(P=0.00)。不同年龄的老年人其MCI发病风险无统计学差异(P>0.05);吸烟、饮酒、喝茶等不同年数及频率的老年人其MCI发病风险无统计学差异(P>0.05);是否午休及不同午休频率和不同每晚睡眠时间的老年人其MCI发病风险无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:性别、教育程度、职业、居住地、运动时间及频率、业余爱好时间等因素与老年MCI发病有关。To explore the influence of risk factors in lifestyle to elderly mild cognitive impairment. Methods: With the score of (mini-mental state examination) MMSE,(Montreal Cognitive Assessment) MoCA, (Clinical dementia rating scale) CDR and the risk factors of life scale, the study investigated 219 elderly people aged over 60 years to analyze high risk factors in lifestyle of mild cognitive impairment. Results: The male was higher than the men in the risk ofMCI (P = 0.03); The illiteracy group was higher than the Primary school group in the risk of MCI, middle school and above group was higher than the Primary school group in the risk ofMCI(P = 0.00); The farmer group was higher than the worker group in the risk of MCI;The worker group was higher than the management group in the risk of MCI (P = 0.01);The rural residents were higher than the urban residents in the risk of MCI (P = 0.01); The exercise influenced the incidence of MCI. Exercise group was higher than the non-exercise group in the risk of MCI (P =0.00); The hobby influenced the incidence of MCI, A hobby group was higher than the non-hobby group in the risk of MCI (P = 0.00). Age was no significant difference in the risk of elderly MCI (P〉 0.05); The groups between different smoking, drinking, drinking tea (the history of years, frequency, etc.) were no significant difference in the risk of elderly MCI (P〉 0.05); Whether the lunch break or not, different frequency of lunch break and different sleeping hours per night were no significant different in the risk of elderly MCI (P〉 0.05). Conclusions: gender, education level, occupation, place of residence, exercise and hobbies and so on had something to do with the risk of elderly MCI.

关 键 词:轻度认知障碍(MCI) 老年 生活因素 

分 类 号:R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象