检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华儿科杂志》1999年第8期494-496,共3页Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
摘 要:目的 探讨仰俯卧位对早产儿肺功能的影响。方法 应用美国Bicore 公司的CP100新生儿肺功能监护仪,分别测定30 例健康早产儿[( 胎龄34.5±0.3)周,体重(1 905±52) g] 仰、俯卧位时肺功能。结果 俯卧位潮气量为(5.400 ±0.200)mlkg,明显高于仰卧位时的(4.700 ±0.200)mlkg(P< 0.01);俯卧位气道阻力为(33.750 ±3.000) mmHg(L·s) ,明显低于仰卧位时的(43.000 ±4.000)(L·s)( P< 0.01) ;俯卧位动态肺顺应性为(3.380 ±0.160) ml(mmHg·kg) ,明显高于仰卧位时的(2.380±0.110) ml(mmHg·kg)( P<0.01) ;仰俯卧位时呼吸频率、每分通气量、时间常数及呼吸功差异均无显著意义。结论 俯卧位可改善早产儿的潮气量和动态肺顺应性,降低气道阻力。提示俯卧位可能是改善早产儿肺功能的适宜体位。Objective To study the effects of prone and supine positions on pulmonary function in preterm neonates Methods Pulmonary functions in prone and supine positions were investigated by Biocore CP 100 neonatal pulmonary monitor in 30 preterm neonates Their gestational age was (34 5±0 3) weeks, and birth weight was (1 905± 52) grams Results Tidal volume and dynamic lung compliance in prone were significantly higher than those in supine position (5 400±0 200) ml/kg vs (4 700±0 200) ml/kg and (3 380±0 160) ml/[(mmHg·kg)(1 mmHg=0 133 kPa)] vs (2 380±0 110) ml/(mmHg·kg) ( P <0 01) Airway resistance in prone was lower than that in supine (33 750±3 000) mmHg/(L·sec) vs (43 000±4 000) mmHg/(L·sec) ( P < 0 01) There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, minute ventilation, time constant and work of breathing between the two positions Conclusion Pulmonary function of preterm neonates could be improved in prone position which might be a better rest position
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28