检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:窦海丽
机构地区:[1]宁夏回族自治区西吉县中医院妇产科,宁夏西吉756200
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2011年第5期516-518,共3页China Journal of Endoscopy
摘 要:目的比较激光、微波、宫腔镜电切术治疗宫颈疾病的临床效果。方法选取该院经此3种方法治疗的慢性宫颈炎患者150例,分为激光组、微波组和电切组各50例,比较3组患者的痊愈率、手术出血总量、60d愈合人数、复发率等指标。结果宫腔镜电切术的临床疗效要优于微波组和激光组,与微波组和激光组比较,各项指观察指标的差异均有显著性(P<0.05),且电切组能达到整形的目的。结论宫腔镜电切术治疗慢性宫颈疾病疗效确切,患者满意,值得在临床推广使用。[Objective] To Compare clinical effect of lasers, microwave and hysteroscope electrotomy for cervical disease. [Methods] 150 cases of chronic cervicitis patients were divided into three groups: laser, electrotomy and microwave groups, each with 50 cases, recovery rate of patients into three groups, operative hemorrhage total number of 60 days to heal and the recurrence rate were compared. [Results] Clinical effect of hysteroscopic electrotomy was better than the laser and microwave group, indexes of hysteroscopic group were statistically different (P 0.05) compared with microwave and laser groups. [Conclusion] Hysteroscopic electric resection in treatment of chronic cervical diseases is bettert. It is worthy of clinical use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145