论国际投资条约仲裁的正当性缺失及其矫正  

On the Legitimacy Gap in Investment Treaty Arbitration and its Remedies

作　　者：郭玉军[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所

出　　处：《法学家》2011年第3期141-152,179-180,共12页The Jurist

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"中国国家豁免立法问题研究"(项目编号:10JJD820004)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：随着投资条约仲裁案件不断攀升,国际投资法以及投资条约仲裁凸显其重要性。但由于投资争议的特殊性、有关实体法的模糊或缺失、程序法的缺陷,出现了投资条约仲裁的正当性危机。实际上危机一说有夸张之嫌。经过制度化的改良,如通过增强仲裁程序透明度、允许法庭之友参与仲裁程序、合并审理、遵循先例、加强投资条约仲裁的公共功能等,投资条约仲裁制度的正当性缺失可在相当程度上得以矫正。同时,在国际投资实践中还应该细化投资条约的核心内容、限制管理国家风险、推动ADR和DPPs,以有效地防止争议发生和降低争议解决成本。With the increasing number of cases of investment treaty arbitration,international investment law and investment treaty arbitration are becoming more and more important.However,the characteristics of investment disputes,the ambiguity or deficit of substantive law and the shortcomings of procedural law lead to the legitimacy crisis in investment treaty arbitration.In fact,the so called crisis is no more than an exaggeration.The legitimacy gap in investment treaty arbitration may be cured to a certain extend by institutional reform,such as enhancing transparency of the arbitral process,permitting the Amicus Curiae intervention,consolidation of cases,application of precedence and ensuring the public function of arbitration process.At the same time,it is an effective way to prevent disputes and decrease the cost of dispute resolution by providing textual certainty in investment treaties,restricting and managing the risks of states,and promoting the ADR as well as DPPs.

关 键 词：投资条约仲裁 正当性危机 正当性缺失 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学] D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]