我国侵犯著作权犯罪“营利目的”要件研究——TRIPS协定和因特网条约的视角  

Research on Element of Purpose for Profit in PRC Criminal Copyright Law:A TRIPS Agreement and Internet Treaties Perspective

作　　者：贺志军[1] 袁艳霞[2] 

机构地区：[1]湖南商学院廉政法治研究所,长沙410205 [2]湖南商学院财金学院,长沙410205

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第3期37-43,共7页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:"中国特色知识产权刑事司法保护机制实证研究"(10CFX031)

摘　　要：我国对侵犯著作权犯罪"营利目的"要件存废问题,大致有取消论和保留论的对立。TRIPS协定中"蓄意"规定不应排除成员采取"营利目的"实施方法,"蓄意商业规模"一般可意味着以营利为目的,故我国侵犯著作权犯罪"营利目的"要件与协定具有符合性。基于网络技术的迅猛发展和"因特网条约"在我国的适用,"传统——网络二分论"应成为"营利目的"要件在我国侵犯著作权犯罪中存废与否的未来走向。There are different viewpoints on whether ＂purpose for profit＂ should be maintained in PRC criminal copyright law.The ＂wilful＂ requirement in TRIPS Agreement should not exclude the method of implementation based on ＂purpose for profit＂.The ＂wilful commercial-scale＂ requirement probably connotes ＂purpose for profit ＂.The purpose for profit in PRC criminal copyright law is in conformity with TRIPS criminal obligation.With the rapid development of Internet technology in and the application of Internet Treaties to PRC,the ＂tradition-Internet＂ dichotomy should lead the trend in the future of PRC criminal copyright law.

关 键 词：侵犯著作权犯罪 营利目的 TRIPS协定 因特网条约 

分 类 号：D913.4[政治法律—民商法学]