国际冲突调停的理论与方法争鸣--评《调停国际危机》、《国际冲突调停》与《国际调停互动》  

The Theoretical and Methodological Debates on International Conflict Mediation:A Review of Mediating International Crises,International Conflict Mediation and International Mediation Interaction

作　　者：陈冲[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学

出　　处：《当代亚太》2011年第3期132-157,132,共26页Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies

摘　　要：调停作为一种第三方干预冲突方式,近年来在国际冲突管理和解决中发挥着越来越重要的作用。传统的调停研究路径主要关注国家行为体的调停活动。然而,随着冷战的结束以及非国家行为体如联合国等在国际冲突调停中的作用的不断加强,传统的国家中心主义路径在调停研究中受到了极大的挑战,并开始逐渐失去其主导地位。在这些新的路径引导下,产生了一大批新的经验研究成果。本文结合三部代表国际冲突调停研究新方法的最新著作,围绕调停的发生、过程和效果三个层面,比较系统地梳理了当前学界关于国际调停的最新研究成果,展示了他们在理论与方法上的争鸣。最后,本文评估了这些研究的主要贡献和不足之处,并指出了有待继续拓展的一些议题。Over the past several decades, mediation, or third party intervention in a conflict has played an increasingly significant role in management and resolution of international conflicts. Traditionally research on mediation has focused on the role of state actors in mediating conflict. Following the conclusion of the Cold War, the role of non-state actors such as the United Nations in mediating international conflicts has increased greatly, exposing the limits of traditional state-centric research. A number of empirical studies have worked towards capturing these new trends in the modes of mediation. This article reviews three studies of international conflict mediation that employ new research methods, and focusing on instances, processes and outcomes of mediation, offers a systematic overview of new scholarly research in the field, presenting the key theoretical and methodological debates. In closing, the article assesses the contributions and limitations of this literature, and proposes a future research agenda.

关 键 词：国际调停 冲突管理 方法论争鸣 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]