检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘勇[1] 周冀衡[1] 周国生 王小兵[1] 方明
机构地区:[1]湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院烟草研究院,湖南长沙410128 [2]湖南省烟草公司郴州市公司,湖南郴州423000
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2011年第15期8904-8905,共2页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:中国烟叶公司资助项目(09A02)
摘 要:[目的]探讨不同烤烟品种上部烟叶采用集中采收的适用性。[方法]对不同烤烟品种(K326、云87和粤97)采取集中一次性采收的效果进行了比较。[结果]各品种在不同评价指标中具有各自的优势。集中采收方式下,云87和粤97烟叶开片较好,含梗率和叶厚度相对较小,化学成分较协调;K326品种单叶重和叶密度相对较小,烟碱含量较高,总糖和还原糖含量较低,整体表现较差。[结论]集中采收上部烟叶在不同烤烟品种上的适宜性大小为云87≥粤97>K326。为提高上部烟叶质量提供了理论依据。[Objective] The aim was to study effects of concentration harvesting on physicochemical characters of different varieties of flue-cured tobacco upper leaves.[Method] Effects of different varieties of flue-cured tobacco from concentration harvesting were compared.[Result] Each tobacco variety had its own advantages in all the evaluation indexes.Yun 87 and Yue 97 had better open degree and relatively small stem percentage and leaf density,meanwhile their chemical compositions were more coordination under the concentration harvesting method.K326 had relatively minor single leaf weight and leaf density,a higher content of nicotine and lower contents of total sugar and reducing sugar,but its overall performance was worse.[Conclusion] The suitability of concentration harvesting method in different varieties upper leaves was in order of Yun 87≥Yue 97K326.The research provides theoretical basis for improving the quality of flue-cured tobacco upper leaves.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229