检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊红芳[1] 李占江[1] 王娜[1] 韩海英[1] 姚淑敏[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安定医院临床心理学系,北京100088
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2011年第3期382-384,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAI77B11)
摘 要:目的:探讨惊恐障碍患者非理性信念、应对方式特点及其与症状的关系。方法:采用非理性信念问卷、应对方式问卷测评40例惊恐障碍患者及40例正常对照,并对惊恐障碍患者进行惊恐障碍严重程度量表的测评。结果:①与正常对照组相比,患者的非理性信念水平明显偏高(P<0.01),在自责、求助、幻想、回避、合理化应对方式上得分较高(P<0.05);②多元逐步回归结果显示:疾病严重程度量表总分受幻想因子与求助因子影响,与幻想呈正相关(β=0.422,P<0.01),与求助呈负相关(β=-0.339,P<0.05)。结论:惊恐障碍患者具有概括化评论、低挫折耐受和绝对化要求的非理性信念,且多采用自责、求助、幻想、回避、合理化的应对策略;幻想、求助应对方式可预测惊恐障碍严重程度。Objective: To investigate the characteristics of irrational beliefs,coping style and their relationship with symptoms of panic disorder(PD).Methods: 40 PD patients and 40 normal persons as control group were assessed with Irrational Beliefs Scale(IBS),Coping Style Questionnaire(CSQ),and the PD patients were assessed with Panic Disorder Severity Scale(PDSS).Results: ①Compared with the control group,the sub-scores of irrational beliefs of the patients were significantly higher(P0.01),and the scores of self-blame,help-seeking,fantasy,avoidance and rationalization were higher(P0.05).②The score of PDSS was influenced by the level of fantasy and help-seeking.It was positively correlated with the scores of fantasy factor(β=0.422,P 0.01),negatively correlated with the scores of help-seeking factor(β=-0.339,P0.05).Conclusion: The PD patients have irrational beliefs such as global evaluation,low frustration tolerance and absolute demands.Most of the PD patients select the coping styles such as self-blame,help-seeking,fantasy,avoidance and rationalization.The severity of PD is influenced by the level of coping strategy,such as fantasy and help-seeking.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249