检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何云[1]
机构地区:[1]中煤国际工程集团重庆设计研究院,重庆400000
出 处:《工程建设与设计》2011年第6期146-149,共4页Construction & Design for Engineering
摘 要:针对桥梁结构多为简支梁和连续梁的形式,文章使用了柔度差法对梁结构的损伤识别进行了研究。文章首先分别推导了一阶振型变化率和柔度差的识别理论;然后使用ansys有限元分析软件对简支梁和连续梁进行了损伤数值模拟,并使用此两种识别指标进行损伤识别;最后比较了两种指标的识别效果。文章还对梁结构的多处损伤进行了研究。结果表明:对于梁结构柔度差法的损伤识别效果优于一阶振型变化率,且同样仅需少数的前几阶模态数据。For the case of simple beam and continuous beam always being seen in bridge, in this paper method of difference of flexibility is used to detect damage o fbeam structure. At first, the author deduces the theory o fchange rate of the first mode shape and difference of flexibility for damage detection. Then, ANSYS, a Finite Element Analysis Software are used to simulate structural damage of simple beam and continuous beam. The two above damage indictors be used to locate the location of damage inbeam. At last, the results of damage detection are compared. In the paper, case of several damage of beam at the same time is studied. The result shows that for damage detection of beam the method of difference of flexibility is better than change rate of the first mode shape. In addition to, only few first mode data is need for damage detection.
关 键 词:柔度差 损伤识别 简支梁 连续梁 一阶振型变化率
分 类 号:U441[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程] TU311[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28