检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院,上海200433
出 处:《中国初级卫生保健》2011年第6期4-6,共3页Chinese Primary Health Care
摘 要:评估目的是掌握各街道的健康城市建设工作情况,发现问题以改进工作,并积累评估经验以提高评估科学性。方法评估对象是上海市长宁区10个街道镇,评估内容包括过程评价与结果评价。采用"工作考核"、"协作度评价"和"满意度评价"一级指标;资料来源有资料评阅、机构调查和居民问卷调查。结果工作考核10个街道中有9个的得分率接近80.00%或以上,街道与部门工作的协作度评价平均得分率92.50%,居民评价总体稍逊于过程评价且存在街道间不平衡。结论各街道在健康城市建设3年行动中努力开展工作,积极配合上级部门,工作取得一定成效,未来要进一步巩固工作效果。The aim of the evaluation is to find out if the healthy city program is being implemented by local governments at street levels according to the plan and to learn from their experiences.The evaluation has been conducted in 9 streets and 1 town in Changning District,Shanghai,China.It includes process and impact evaluation.Indicators to measure efforts,collaboration and resident's satisfaction haven been adopted.Data have been collected through interviews with relational people and questionnaire.The scoring rate of "the efforts" of the 9 local governments in 10 are about 80.0%,the average scoring rate of the collaboration is 92.50%.The scoring rate of resident's satisfaction is relatively low.There is an imbalance in the results between the streets.The results shows that these local governments have made great efforts to implement the healthy city program and have made great achievements.In the future they should pay more attention on the improvement of their work's effect.
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229