检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院,上海200240
出 处:《水资源保护》2011年第3期49-53,共5页Water Resources Protection
基 金:国家海洋公益行业科研专项(20080506)
摘 要:从环境、自然资源、经济和社会的整体效益出发,以乐清湾COD总量控制为例建立了一种基于层次分析法的水污染物总量群决策分配方法。AHP准则层中评价指标的权重分别以专家评分法和相互重要性比较判断矩阵法来确定,子准则层中评价指标的权重分别以专家评分法、标准偏差法、熵法和理想权重优化模型来确定,从而构成各乡镇允许排污量相对于汇水区允许排污总量目标层的分配权重准则策略集。最后采用群决策博弈模型,将允许排污总量在乡镇之间进行分配。结果表明:该分配方法不仅克服了单一分配权重准则的不公平性,而且将政府决策和公众参与相结合,保证了分配依据的合理性和分配过程的公平性。For the overall benefits of environment,natural resources,economy and society,the group decision allocation approach for the total amount control of water pollutants based on an analytic hierarchy structure process(AHP) was established using COD total amount control in Leqing Bay as an example.The weight of indexes in the criteria level of AHP was determined by expert rating method and method of comparative judgment matrix of mutual importance respectively,while the weight of indexes in the sub-criteria level was determined by expert rating method,standard deviation(SD) method,entropy method and ideal weight optimization model,respectively.The set of target level allocation weight rules of allowable waste load of each township relative to total allowable waste load in catchment area was constructed.The permitted amount of pollutants was allocated among townships through the group decision game model.The results showed that the approach not only overcomes the unjustness due to using the single weight distribution method,but also the reasonableness of allocation rules and justice of allocation process were guaranteed by combination of the governmental decision with public participation.
分 类 号:X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116