检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高仲亮[1,2] 周汝良[1] 李浩[3] 戴柔毅[3] 李俊[3]
机构地区:[1]西南林业大学保护生物学学院,云南昆明650224 [2]云南省森林灾害预警与控制重点试验室,云南昆明650224 [3]西南林业大学资源学院,云南昆明650224
出 处:《福建林业科技》2011年第2期30-34,共5页Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划课题"亚热带森林林区营林固碳技术研究与示范(编号:2008BAD95B09)";云南省重点学科森林保护学(编号:XKZ200905)资助
摘 要:以云南景谷县思茅松林为典型案例,从追求最大固碳效率为出发点,研究和评价计划烧除林和常规林2种森林管理模式林下各类可燃物含水率、载量、碳贮量和腐殖层厚度等。试验结果表明:经计划烧除后林下枯落物载量和细小可燃物载量跟常规林没有明显区别,且可燃物载量变化幅度相对稳定,但腐殖质层的高载量致使林下可燃物载量比常规林高2.92t.hm-2,平均碳贮量比常规林高1.943 t.hm-2,且腐殖层厚度比常规林厚0.526 cm,说明计划烧除可增加森林的固碳量,达到森林增汇效益。Taking Pinus Kesiya Royle ex Gord.Var.langbianensis in Jinggu,Yunnan as the typical case,from the starting point for obtaining the maximum efficiency of carbon sequestration,this paper researched and evaluated the fuel moisture content,load,carbon and humus layer thickness with 2 different forest management models including prescribed burning forest and conventional forest.Experimental results showed that after prescribed burning,litter load and fine fuel load had no significant difference with conventional forest,and the fuel load change amplitude was relatively stable,however,the humus story high loads resulted in understory fuel load's being 2.92t·hm-2 higher than the conventional forest,the average carbon storage's being 1.943t·hm-2 higher than the conventional forest,and the humus layer thickness's being 0.526cm more than the conventional forest,the data on these three areas prescribed burning increase carbon sequestration of forests,and achieve forest efficiency.
分 类 号:S791.259[农业科学—林木遗传育种] S762.8[农业科学—林学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222