传统包扎疗法与MEBT/MEBO治疗移植皮片脱落创面对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Conventional Bandaging Therapy and MEBT/MEBO for Treating Wounds with Skin Graft Exfoliation (A Report of 199 Cases)

作　　者：罗利达[1] 陈斌[1] 孙爱国[1] 张智[1] 陈立珂[1] 叶传新 

机构地区：[1]四川省自贡市第四人民医院,643000 [2]四川省自贡市救中心,643000

出　　处：《中国烧伤创疡杂志》1999年第4期17-18,共2页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers

摘　　要：目的：大面积深度烧伤创面移植皮片脱失后所邢成的残余创面，采用传统换药或适时进行手术植皮效果不佳，为进一步观察MEBT／MEBO技术的疗效，全组采用了该方法治疗。方法：112例病人为MEBT组，87例为传统包扎换药治疗组。结果：MEBT／MEBO组治愈率为100％，传统疗法组为89．96％，X^2＝12．14，P＜0．01。结论：MEBT/MEBO技术治疗大面积深度烧伤创面移植皮片脱失后所形成的残余创面优于传统换药方法。Objective: Residual wounds formed after exfoliatiosn of skin graft in large area burnwounds are difficult to heal. This study is toinvestigate the efficacy of MEBT/MEBO in treating suchcases. Method: 112 cases were treated with MEBT/MEBO and 87 cases were treated with conven-tional bandaging method. Results: The curative rate in MEBT/MEBO group was 100%, while inconventiorial bandaging group, the curative rate was 89. 96 % (X2 = 12. 14, P < 0. 01 ). Chnclusion:MEBT/MEBO is superior to conventional bandaging method in treating residual wounds of large areadeep burn with skin graft exfoliated.[

关 键 词：移植皮片脱落 传统包扎 MEBT MEBO 治疗 烧伤 

分 类 号：R644.05[医药卫生—外科学]