“985”高校科研不端行为的“立法”研究  

On "985" Universities'Legislations of Research Misconduct

作　　者：袁维勤[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学法学院,重庆400067

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期81-90,共10页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：科技部科研诚信建设专项课题"调查处理科研不端行为的法律依据研究";教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJC820129)

摘　　要：研究"985"高校科研不端行为"立法"具有重要意义。对内来说,关系到它们作为"软法"能否对本校的科研不端现象发挥有效的治理作用。对外来讲,关系到它们对国内其它一千多所高校以及高校之外的众多科研机构制定科研不端"立法"发挥积极还是消极的"榜样"作用。统计研究表明:"985"高校"立法"之间对科研不端的各项表现的共识度除少数外,普遍比较低;在"立法"用语上"科研不端"与"学术不端"并无严格区别;在"立法"细化程度上清华大学最高,华南理工大学和中国人民大学最低;在科研不端"立法"模式上存在两种模式,两者各有优劣。It is very important to study ＂985＂ universities＇ legislations of research misconduct,which is related to them as ＂soft law＂ in these universities to play an effective role in regulating research misconduct and as good models for others.Statistics show： a few consensuses are reached among their legislations of research misconduct;there is no strict distinction between ＂research misconduct＂ and ＂academic misconduct＂ as a term;on the legislation details,Tsinghua University has the most while South China University of Technology,the least;and two legislation models exist in these universities.

关 键 词：“985”高校 科研不端 立法 软法 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]