经腹改良式子宫切除术与传统子宫切除术临床比较  

Abdominal hysterectomy nvda with traditional hysterectomy clinical comparison

作　　者：刘慧 夏本秀 缪春萍 

机构地区：[1]云南省宣威市第二人民医院,655400

出　　处：《健康必读（下）》2011年第1期15-15,17,共2页

摘　　要：目的：探讨经腹改良子宫切除术与传统子宫切除术的临床应用效果.方法：回顾性分析：经腹改良式子宫切除术（为观察组）与传统子宫切除术（为对照组）各取32例进行临床对比.结果：两组患者无并发症发生,观察组比时照组平均出血量少（P＜0.05）,手术时间短（P＜0.01）,术后排气时间早（P＜0.01）,术后镇痛时间短（P＜0.01）,住院时间两组无显著差异（P＞0.05）.结论：改良腹式子宫切除术组织损伤小,出血少,术后恢复快,优于传统腹式子宫切除术.Objective： To evaluate the improved abdominal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy clinical effect. Methods： Retrospective analysis： Improved abdominal hysterectomy （observation group） and the traditional hysterectomy （control group） from each of 32 patients with a clinical comparison. RESULTS： There were no complications in the observation group than the control group was less blood loss （P〈0.05）, shorter operative time （P〈0.01）, after the exhaust earlier （P〈0.01）, postoperative analgesia Shorter （P〈0.01）, length of hospital stay was no significant difference （P〉0.05）. Conclusion： The modified abdominal hysterectomy, tissue damage, less bleeding, faster recovery, better than traditional abdominal hysterectomy.

关 键 词：子宫切除术 经腹改良式子宫切除术 传统式子宫切除术 

分 类 号：R697.33[医药卫生—泌尿科学]