检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《白求恩军医学院学报》2011年第3期228-230,共3页Journal of Bethune Military Medical College
摘 要:目的探讨两台不同型号全自动生化分析仪检测血浆葡萄糖结果的可比性。方法按照EP9-A2文件要求,用ROCHEP800为对比仪器,TOSIBAACCTUE为评价仪器,测定相同血浆标本的葡萄糖浓度;以美国临床实验室修正法规(CLIA'88)规定的室间质量评价允许误差范围的1/3为标准,判断两台仪器的临床可接受性。结果两台不同全自动生化分析仪检测葡萄糖结果相关性良好(r>0.975),临床可接受性能评价在可接受范围。结论两台不同品牌全自动生化分析仪的葡萄糖检测结果具有良好的可比性。Objective To assess the comparability of measurement results for plasma glucose from two automatic biochemical systems.Methods According to the requirements in American EP9-A2 file, plasma glucose concentrations in the same plasma samples were determined, using ROCHE P800 as a standard system and TOSIBA ACCTUE as the experimental one. The clinical acceptability of the two kinds of biochemical analyzers was judged based on the criteria for quality assessment among clinical laboratories in American amend legislation (CLIA'88)in which the required criteria is defined as one third of allowable error.Results The glucose results from two kinds of instruments showed a good correlation(r0.975); clinical acceptability of the instruments was in the acceptable range.Conclusion The detected glucose results of two instruments have good comparability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222