论金融诈骗罪中的死刑  

On the Execution of Finacial Fraud Crime

作　　者：胡东平[1] 詹明[2] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330000 [2]中共江西省委党校法学教研部,江西南昌330000

出　　处：《湖南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期67-71,共5页Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：我国刑法对于金融诈骗犯罪的立法经历了不适用死刑、有选择地适用死刑和保留但严格限制死刑三个阶段。在我国死刑的存在目前还是具有一定合理性的,但应逐渐限制并在将来废除死刑,这是刑法学者的共识。在金融诈骗罪的死刑问题上有废除论和保留论两种观点。对金融诈骗罪适用死刑,既不利于刑罚的报应功能的实现,也不能预防、减少金融诈骗犯罪的发生,因此,我国刑法应当取消金融诈骗罪的死刑规定。There are three phases in the eveolution of Chinese criminal law,namely,no application of execution,selective application of execution and reserving but strictly limitting execution.It is reasonable to keep execution in China currently.However,there are general opinions in scholars of criminal law that execution should be limited gradually and be abolished in future.There are two opinions about execution of financial fraud crime： abolishing execution and reserving execution.Execution of financial frand crime is not helpful to achieve retributive function of penalty,and can not prevent and decrease financial fraud crime.Therefore,execution provision should be cancelled in China＇s criminal law.

关 键 词：金融诈骗罪 死刑 报应 预防 

分 类 号：D924.33[政治法律—刑法学]