检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚泽宣[1]
出 处:《东南亚研究》2011年第3期26-32,共7页Southeast Asian Studies
摘 要:自泰国从西方引入民主制度以来,其政治制度的危机一直呈现周期性发生的情形。学术界对这一现象进行理论探讨的学者很多,但他们大多将导致这种危机周期性发生的根源,归结于泰国自身的国情复杂性方面的种种内源性因素。本文将理论探讨的重点,投射到泰国政治危机的外源性因素——即泰国从西方舶来的民主制度本身固有的制度性缺陷方面。通过深入的理论分析和对比,作者得出了泰国当前政治制度危机与现代西方民主主义理论所涵盖的谬误直接相关联的结论。而作者得出这一结论的理论参照坐标是共和主义的观念形态和制度原则与民主主义的重大差异。Since Thailand introduced democracy from the west to transform its institution, political crises periodically occurred. Many scholars have participated in research upon this phenomenon, but all of them impute the causes to the complicity of Thailand's domestic conditions. This thesis puts its focus on the intrinsic defects and malpractices of democratic theories and institution, which for Thailand is "imported goods". Throughout profound theoretical analyses and comparisons, the author draws his conclusion that the political crises periodically occurring in Thailand have adirect connection with the falsehoods and mistakes of contemporary democratic theories. And the reference frames which lead the author to come to this conclusion are the enormous divergences of the values, ideologies and principles between the republicanism and democratism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.190.205