牙间隙不同清洁方法效果比较  

Comparison of interdental cleaning methods

作　　者：金爱琼[1] 朱蔷[1] 辜岷[1] 张磊[2] 

机构地区：[1]深圳市第二人民医院口腔科,广东深圳518035 [2]深圳大学生物医药研究所

出　　处：《护理学杂志》2011年第10期59-61,共3页

摘　　要：目的比较慢性牙周炎患者使用牙间刷或牙线去除菌斑、改善牙周炎症的效果。方法将61例牙周炎患者进行1次10 min口腔刮治术后,随机分为两组,分别用牙间刷或牙线作为每日刷牙的辅助手段,6周后复查牙周参数。结果与基线比较,6周后两组牙菌斑指数(PI)、Eastman牙间出血指数(EIBI)、探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)均值显著降低,而相对牙间隙乳头水平(RIPL)均值显著升高(均P<0.01)。牙间刷组上述参数基线与6周均数差值变化幅度显著大于牙线组(均P<0.05)。结论通过采取牙间隙清洁措施,慢性牙周炎患者获益明显。牙间刷在去除菌斑、改善牙周炎症方面的效果明显优于牙线。Objective To compare the effects of a customized interdental brushing technique and a customized flossing technique on clinical periodontal outcomes in chronic periodontitis cases.Methods Totally,61 patients with chronic periodontitis after receiving a 10-minute hand scaling to remove easily accessible calculus deposits were assigned either to a group,using interdental brushing technique as adjuvant of toothbrushing,or to a group using flossing technique.Such parameters as plaque index（PI）,relative interdental papillae level（RIPL）,Eastman interdental bleeding index（EIBI）,probing depths（PD） and bleeding on probing（BOP） were measured before and after 6-week intervention.Results There were significant reductions from baseline for PI,EIBI,PD and BOP in both groups,while RIPL was significantly increased（P0.01 for all）.At 6th week,the interdental brush group improved more than the floss group in every parameter（P0.05 for all）.Conclusion Patients with chronic periodontitis can benefit from interdental cleaning,particularly using interdental brushes.

关 键 词：慢性牙周炎 牙间刷 牙线 刷牙 菌斑 

分 类 号：R473.78[医药卫生—护理学]