论台湾地区检察官人事迁调民主化之得失———兼谈台湾地区检改运动  

On the Gains and Losses of the Democratization of Prosecutor Promotion and Transfer of Personnel in Taiwan——Also on the Reform Movement in Taiwan Prosecutors

作　　者：林贵文[1] 田香香[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建江夏学院法学系,福建福州350108

出　　处：《台湾研究集刊》2011年第3期20-27,共8页Taiwan Research Journal

基　　金：福建江夏学院院级课题"台湾地区司法独立运动研究"(2010C005)

摘　　要：检察官人事迁调民主化是检察官独立的前提保障。我国台湾地区经过"解严"后的司法民主运动,特别是检察系统内部的检改运动,检察官人事迁调民主化得到一定程度的实现。但是,检察官转任和转调依然缺乏法律保障,"法务部"对于检察官人事迁调案仍然有一定的控制权,泛政治化的影响对于检察官的人事民主化也往往产生制度外的障碍。此外,检察官人事案件缺乏民主问责等都影响检察官独立对人事迁调民主化的应然诉求。Democratization of the Prosecutor for transfer of personnel is the premise of the independence of the Prosecutor.Through the democratic movement of justice after ＂remove curfew＂,in particular,Prosecutor reform movement within Prosecutors system,Taiwan＇s democratization of prosecutor transfer to a certain degree achieved.However,modulation and transfer of prosecutors are lack of legal protection,＂Ministry of Justice＂ still controls the promotion and mobilization of prosecutors.The impact of pan-politicization of personnel for the democratization of the Prosecutor is also often produce obstacles outside the system.In addition,the lack of democratic accountability of prosecutor personnel cases Impact the Independence of the Prosecutor require promotion of democratic mobilization of personnel should be.

关 键 词：检察独立 人事民主化 保障 民主问责 

分 类 号：D927.58[政治法律—法学]