稳定是企业劳动关系的本质要求——从雇员区别于民事主体的身份特殊性出发  

Stability Is Essential Requirement of Enterprise's Labor Relations——from Employees' Particularity in Identity that Differs from Civil Subject

作　　者：钱叶芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]温州大学瓯江学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《温州大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期69-77,共9页Journal of Wenzhou University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(09BFX057)

摘　　要：民法原理不能为劳动关系的稳定诉求提供合理的法理解释,而雇员身份的特殊性可以给劳动关系的稳定诉求提供独立于民法原理的另一种法理基础。在民事身份的演化过程中,正身份和负身份的古代法含义随着契约社会的发展,转变为强势身份与弱势身份,但并非所有的负身份者都能合乎民法原理和逻辑地接受其社会化的保护政策。雇员身份与民法内在逻辑的冲突决定了民法社会化的范围无法合理地延伸至劳动关系领域。劳动关系的稳定诉求是由雇主与雇员之间的人身从属性所衍生的义务决定的。而且,人身关系先于财产关系,因而,对劳动关系而言,稳定诉求比和谐诉求更为本质。While principle of Civil Law cannot seemly provide reasonable legal interpretation for requirement for labor relations’ stability,employees’ particular identity provides unique legal basis other than Civil Law.In civil identity’s evolution,with development of contract society,ancient law meaning of positive identity and negative identity has turned into that of strong identity and disadvantaged identity.But,not all the negative identity can be protected by civil law’s socialization through being conformed by civil law’s basic principle and logic.Conflict between employees’ identity and Civil Law’s internal logic determines the scope of socialized Civil Law could not properly extend to labor relation field.Appealing for stability of labor relations is determined by obligations derived from the personal dependency between the parties.Furthermore,personal relation precedes property relation,so stability is more essential than harmony in labor relations.

关 键 词：劳动关系 雇员身份 人身从属性 稳定 和谐 

分 类 号：D922.5[政治法律—民商法学]