我国学术期刊评价体系的完善与体育学术期刊的应对策略  

Perfection of Chinese Academic Journal Evaluation System and Response Strategy of Sport Academic Journals

作　　者：李爱群[1] 赵蕴[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉体育学院期刊社,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《评价与管理》2011年第2期19-23,共5页Evaluation & Management

摘　　要：同行评议、文献计量学评价及期刊评奖是目前我国学术期刊评价的3种评价形式,已建立了比较完备的体系,但从评价本身的准确性、全面性来看,学术期刊评价体系仍存在着一些局限与不足之处。营造合理的评价机制和和谐的学术氛围是评价深入并持续开展的前提,正确看待期刊评价,建立学科的引文数据库,在网络环境下实现从形式评价到内容评价的转变,以逐步完善评价体系。为此,体育学术期刊应发挥评价主体的作用,加强对学术期刊评价中相关指标的分析,调整编辑出版工作重心,办好刊物。Peer review, academic journal evaluation and deciding rewards for journals are the three evaluation forms in the Chinese academic journal evaluation system. In China, although a complete evaluation system is established, it still has limits and weaknesses as seen from the accuracy of the system. Therefore, the prerequisite is to create a reasonable evaluation mechanism and harmonious academic atmosphere. Moreover, rational attitudes towards jour- nal evaluation are necessary. Citation databases for each discipline should be established. Evaluation on the form should be changed into evaluation on the content through network environment so as to further perfect the evaluation system. Sport academic journals should further emphasize the analysis of the relative indexes, readjust the centre of editing and publishing with yield to its function as a main body

关 键 词：期刊评价 学术期刊 同行评议 期刊评奖 体育学术期刊 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]