检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]济南市规划设计研究院,山东济南250001 [2]清华大学环境科学与工程系,北京100084
出 处:《中国环境科学》1999年第6期518-521,共4页China Environmental Science
基 金:"八五"国家科技攻关课题!85-912-01-05
摘 要:选用合适的民用清洁煤技术是提高居民生活用煤能源利用效率、减少环境污染的重要途径之一,本文利用笔者提出的清洁煤技术定量评价方法对民用清洁煤技术进行了定量评价与筛选,评价结果表明,在标准状态下各种民用适用清洁煤技术的单位综合成本分别为选煤48元/GJ,民用型煤45.73元/GJ,炼焦制气28.53元/GJ,加压气化联产甲醇54.73元/GJ,加压气化联产油蜡50.71元/GJ,两段炉气化88.66元/GJ,直立炉气化38、84元/GJ,其中炼焦制气是单位综合成本最小的民用清洁煤技术.敏感度分析表明。It is an mportant route to increase efficiency and reduce pollutants on coal using for resident that clean coaltechnologies suitable for resident is to be chosen and used. In this paper, a quantitative assessing method on clean coaltechnologies us is used to assess and screen clean coal technologies suitable for resident. Integrated cost for unit energyproduction on various clean coal technologies suitable for resident is coal cleaning 48.37 yuan/GJ,coal molding for resident 45.37 yuan /GJ,coking 28.53 yuan/GJ,coal pressurized gasification combined with methanol 54.73 yuan/GJ,coalpressurized gasification combined with oil and 50.71 yuan/GJ,coal two-segment stove gasification 88.66 yuan/GJ,erectionstove gasification 38.84 yuan /GJ. Integrated cost for unit energy production on coking is the least. Sensitivity analysis oncoal sulfur and charge for SO2 shows coal gasification is the main development direction for clean coal technologiessurtable for resident.
分 类 号:TQ534.9[化学工程—煤化学工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3