检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯旭[1] 郑宝石[1] 谢晓勇[1] 何巍[1] 吴熙明[1]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第一附属医院心胸外科,南宁市530021
出 处:《微创医学》2011年第3期203-205,共3页Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨二尖瓣生物瓣置换改良间断缝合方法的临床效果。方法 62例二尖瓣瓣膜疾病患者中,23例采用传统间断缝合法,39例采用改良间断缝合法,比较两种手术方法体外循环时间及主动脉阻断时间。结果两组在体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论改良间断缝合法不增加体外循环、主动脉阻断时间,操作简单,下瓣容易,在临床中可考虑使用。Objective To explore the clinical effect of method of mitral valve biological valve replacement with improved interrupted suture.Methods 62 patients underwent mitral valve biological valve replacement were randomly divided into two groups,one group(the control group,23 patients) received mitral valve biological valve replacement with traditional interrupted suture,while the other group(the experimental group,39 patients) underwent operation with improvement interrupted suture.The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aorta block were compared between two groups.Results There was no statistically significance in the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aorta block between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion The method of mitral valve biological valve replacement with improved interrupted suture do not increase the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aorta block,and its operation is more easy compared to that of traditional interrupted suture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249