检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾乾坤
机构地区:[1]扬州大学,江苏扬州225009
出 处:《行政与法》2011年第6期73-76,共4页Administration and Law
摘 要:近年来,我国建筑物抛掷物侵权案件不断出现,由于缺乏明确的法律依据,导致各法院判决大相径庭。新出台的《侵权责任法》第87条确立了抛掷物侵权制度的一般规则。但该条规定过于笼统,因而理论上的正确解析至关重要。本文认为,基于注重对处于弱势的受害者保护之考量,此类型案件应采用无过错责任之归责原则,采取因果关系推定的方式,确立由可能加害的建筑物使用人承担补偿责任,并明确物业管理人在一定范围内之安全保障责任。In recent years there have been many buildings of throwing objects infringement cases.The absence of clear legal basis for the court decision led to very different.New introduction of the "Tort Law" established in article eighty-seventh of the throwing object the general rules of tort system.But the article is too general provisions,the correct theoretical analysis which is even more important.Out of consideration for protection of vulnerable victims,the types of cases should be adopted no-fault liability of responsibility principle,by the way causation presumption.May harm the building by the user bear the compensation liability,and by the property manager within a certain range assumes responsibility for safety and security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222