检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]水利部水利水电规划设计总院,北京100120
出 处:《水利水电科技进展》2011年第3期40-42,69,共4页Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources
摘 要:选取具有代表性的24个拟建大中型水利工程为样本,计算比较同地同价法和现行的16倍法2种补偿标准下的土地补偿补助费用,研究同地同价政策对水利工程土地补偿补助费用的影响,详细分析采用同地同价法后,不同区域、不同省(区)、不同工程类型、不同土地用途补偿标准的变化。结果表明,同地同价法较16倍法土地补偿标准总体提高73%,其中其他土地、草地、水域及水利设施用地增幅较大,塘地、耕地、园地增幅较小。24 representative medium-size and large water conservancy projects to be built were selected as the samples.The land compensation expenses by means of the same-land same-price policy and the current 16 times-method were calculated and compared.The impact of the same-land same-price policy on land compensation in water conservancy projects was studied.The variations of land compensation standards in different regions,provinces(cities),project types and land use types were investigated.The results show that the land compensation standard of the same-land same-price policy method generally has an increase of 73% compared with that of the 16 times-method,including larger increase in land use for others,grassland,water area and land use for water conservancy facilities,and smaller increase in land for ponds,farmland and garden land.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28