检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属西乡人民医院,广东深圳518102
出 处:《海南医学》2011年第12期114-116,共3页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨双胎妊娠的不同分娩方式对妊娠结局的影响。方法对2008-2010年于我院分娩的120例双胎妊娠资料进行回顾性分析,其中剖宫产76例,阴道产44例。结果孕周<34周的新生儿窒息率、病死率显著高于孕周>34周者,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);阴道分娩组第2胎窒息率、死亡率显著高于第1胎,且与剖宫产组比较差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组孕周、产后出血差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与阴道产相比,双胎妊娠剖宫产可减少新生儿窒息率及死亡率。Objective To explore the influence of delivery route on pregnancy outcome in twin pregnancy.Methods The date of 120 cases of twin pregnancy from 2008 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed,among which 76 cases performed cesarean section and 44 underwent vaginal delivery.Results The rate of neonatal asphyxia and case fatality at 34 weeks of gestation were significantly higher than that of 34 weeks of gestation,with statistical meaning(P0.01);the rate of neonatal asphyxia and case fatality of second fetal were higher than that of first fetal,and had significantly difference with cesarean section cases(P0.01);the weeks of gestation and postpartum hemorrhage had no striking difference between the two groups.Conclusion Compared with vaginal delivery,cesarean section for twin pregnancy can decrease the rate of neonatal asphyxia and case fatality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28