法院直接变更指控问题之比较法考察  

Comparative Study of the Issue of the Court's Directl Altering Accusations

作　　者：顾彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学研究生院,北京100088

出　　处：《河北北方学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第3期42-48,共7页Journal of Hebei North University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：英美法系和大陆法系由于所奉行诉讼模式和理念的区别,在法院变更指控问题上有着不同的倾向性。对于审判与控诉的关系处理,大陆法系采"公诉事实同一"原则,英美法系则实行"诉因制度",各国各地区具体的法院变更指控制度也各不相同。In the mode and idea of lawsuit,American Legal System is different from the Continental Law System,which leads to different tendencies on the part of the court＇s altering accusations directly.As to the relation of trial and accusation,the continental legal system follows the principle of ＂being according with the alleged facts＂,while American legal system carries out ＂the system of count＂.Besides,various countries own their peculiar practices on the issue.

关 键 词：法院直接变更指控 比较法 不告不理 公诉事实同一 诉因制度 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]