检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学经贸管理学院,浙江杭州310023 [2]浙江大学公共管理学院,浙江杭州310007
出 处:《科学学研究》2011年第7期1113-1120,1063,共9页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:教育部人文社科规划项目(10YJA6301191)
摘 要:近年来,产品创新是企业获取竞争优势和区域产业升级的关键,企业虽能认识到原始性创新的重大意义,但具体落实到行为却很少,导致企业原始性创新不力的根本问题是企业互搏意愿不足。而目前研究尚未明确互搏意愿的内在结构,从而无法解决企业创新实践中的存在认知与行为差异的"知行悖论"。本文以互搏意愿为起点,剖析其内在结构维度,构建"互搏意愿→产品创新绩效"关系模型,并以产品支持作为调节变量,得出企业互搏意愿与产品创新绩效直接相关联。研究结论为企业产品创新或升级决策和提升产品创新绩效提供切实可行的理论框架。Product innovation is currently seen as the key determinant to acquire competitive advantage and regional industry updating.Although the firm can realize the emergence of radical innovation,Innovative behaviour in organisations is still seldom in chinese firms because of lacking the willingness to cannibalize(WTC).Little research is about the structure of willingness to cannibalize,so we cannot give the solution of the dissonance between recognition and behaviour which is so-called "Paradox of recognition and behaviour".By being analyzed the concept of WTC and being constructed the dimensions of WTC,this paper introduces and empirically tests a structural model of WTC and product innovation performance.The results provided empirical evidence and suggestions for improving firms' product innovation capability through WTC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28