检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋晓勇[1] 张永州[1] 吴先闯[1] 王云香[1] 吕维玲[1] 杨磊[2]
机构地区:[1]河南大学淮河医院,开封市475000 [2]河南大学药学院,开封市475000
出 处:《中国药房》2011年第26期2443-2445,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较酶放大免疫(EMIT)法和高效液相色谱(HPLC)法测定人血浆中环孢素A(CsA)浓度的区别与相关性。方法:收集肾移植患者服药后的稳态谷浓度血样20份,分别用EMIT法和HPLC法进行测定,考察2种测定方法的区别和相关程度。结果:HPLC法和EMIT法检测的CsA血药浓度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),EMIT法测定血浆中CsA浓度较HPLC法高26.4ng·mL-1,通过Passing-Bablok回归分析2种方法具有良好的相关性(r=0.9940)。结论:EMIT法和HPLC法测定CsA血浆药物浓度结果差异具有统计学意义,在临床进行CsA药物浓度监测中应予以关注并作相应调整。OBJECTIVE:To compare the difference and correlation of HPLC and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay test (EMIT) for the determination of blood concentration of CsA in human plasma. METHODS: A total of 20 different concentrations of clinical samples were collected and determined by HPLC and EMIT respectively. The difference and correlation of 2 kinds of determination methods were investigated. RESULTS: There were significant differences in blood concentrations of CsA determined by HPLC and EMIT(P0.05). CsA concentration determined by EMIT were 26.4 ng·mL-1 more than by HPLC. But a satisfactory correlation was achieved between the two methods(r=0.994 0). CONCLUSIONS: There is statistical significance in plasma concentration of CsA determined by EMIT and HPLC. We should pay attention to CsA monitoring by EMIT and HPLC and make some adjustment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222