检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东理工大学商学院,上海200237 [2]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200052
出 处:《管理评论》2011年第6期31-40,48,共11页Management Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(7077206171002052);教育部人文社科基金项目(09YJC630072)
摘 要:机构投资者一直以具有较好的选股能力立足于资本市场。本文利用2004-2007年深交所的上市公司为样本,从信息透明度角度检验机构投资者的选股能力。实证研究发现:与预期一样,在信息透明度评级较高的公司,机构持股比例会较高和持股机构数目会较多,短线机构持股比例会较高;在信息透明度评级上升的公司,机构会调高持股比例和增加机构数目,短线机构会调高持股比例,长线机构投资者并不会基于信息透明度评级的变化调节其持股比例;与预期相反,在信息透明度评级较高的公司长线机构持股比例会较高。因此,提高公司持股机构化的同时拓宽机构投资者信息获取通道是当务之急。It is well-known that institutional investors have the ability to select stocks in the capital market.In this paper,we test institutional investors' stock-selecting ability from the perspective of information transparency by drawing upon companies listed in Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2004 to 2007.The results show that highly information-transparent companies are characterized by higher proportion of institutional ownership,larger number of institutional investors and higher proportion of short-term institutional ownership;when a company's information transparency is rated higher,institutions would increase their shareholdings and the number of institutional investors and short-term institutional investors would increase their shareholdings.Long-term institutional investors may not adjust their shareholdings on the basis of information transparency rating change.Contrary to expectations,the proportion of long-term institutional ownership may be high in companies with high rating of information transparency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222