检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院,成都610064
出 处:《甘肃行政学院学报》2011年第3期119-126,129,共8页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
摘 要:相比于实践中行政调解的火热开展,行政调解在理论研究层面仍显不足。从各省市发布的有关行政调解规范性文件来看,各地对行政调解内涵仍不统一。理论上,由于受传统"行政权不可处分"原理之束缚,多数学者认为行政调解在我国不具有理论基础,且对行政调解这种非诉纠纷解决机制在法理层面的特有应然价值探讨甚少。本文主要从理论层面对行政调解的内涵、法理基础、应然价值进行反思和探讨,以弥补行政调解理论研究的不足。Compared to the administrative mediation in practice,the administrative mediation in theory have not given enough respected in the past.Study on the normative documents of administrative mediation released from the provincial governments,the content about it is still not unified.As in theory it may be impacted by 'public power can not be handled privately',most scholars believe that the administrative mediation does not have a theoretical basis in our country and there is little in study on the unique shouldvalue of administrative mediation the non-complaint mediation in administrative dispute resolution mechanism.This article studied and discussed the content,theoretical basis and the should value of administrative mediation from the theoretical level to compensate for the lack of administrative mediation theories.
关 键 词:行政调解 ADR“ 公权不可处分” 行政权法定主义 行政争议 社会管理创新
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28