检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋立山[1]
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2011年第4期3-13,共11页Law and Social Development
基 金:中国政法大学211工程三期项目"中国特色社会主义法治思想"资助
摘 要:依改革思路所包含的元素多少以及倾向性的政策主张的不同,可以大致把过去30年关于中国法律改革研究划分为一元直线式的改革思路、二元协调式的改革思路与多元协调式的改革思路。此三种法律改革思路,尽管在实际政策主张上可能存在重大分歧,但在知识层面上不是一种相互矛盾或对立的关系,而是一种基础性支持和递进扩展的关系。随着考虑元素的增加,法律改革思路的复杂性呈递增趋势,与实践操作的距离也有可能相对拉近。就目前中国的法律改革现状和趋势看,特别是从中国法治发展战略的宏观层面看,适度提倡和推进多元协调式的法律改革思路问题研究,无论对于拓宽法学的研究方向,或是对于中国的法治实践,都已经显出了某种必要性和迫切性。According to the number of elements and the differences between tendentious policy advocacies incorporated in the reform thinking,the research on the law reform in China in the past 30 years could be generally divided into unary linear thinking,binary coordinated thinking and polynary coordinated thinking.Although there may exist significant divergences on practical policy advocacy,it's not a sort of contradictory or opposite relationship,but a sort of infrastructural support and progressive expansion relationship.As the considered elements increase,the complexity of the thinking of law reform appears an increasing tendency and the distance away from practical operation may be relatively closer.As regard to the present law reform status and tendency in China,especially on the micro-level of development strategy of rule of law in China,appropriate advocating and promoting the research on the problem of polynary coordinated law reform thinking,both for broadening the research direction of law and for the rule of law practice in China,already appears sort of necessity and urgency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249