契约自由的司法境遇——法律方法如何拯救意思自治  

The Judicial Environment of Freedom of Contract:How Method of Law Saves Autonomy of Will

作　　者：谢慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2011年第4期74-83,共10页Law and Social Development

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目"司法视野下的私法自治研究"(09CFX20)

摘　　要：合同裁判中的合同解释传统上以法官为主体,这将作为契约法精神的契约自由原则推进一个危险的境地。抛弃方法论的哲学诠释以重置解释主体的方式来救助"意思自治",在实践中却是首尾难顾。私法裁判中"意思自治"需要在法律方法之维下实现,方法论下合同解释的主体只能是法官,在法律渊源、法律发现与法律解释等诸种法律方法的制约下,法官只能处于司法克制主义的状态,而正是这种克制性司法,给予了"意思自治"最可能的生存空间。Judges are traditionally regarded as subjects in the interpretation of law in contract judgment,and this pushes the principle of freedom of contract which is the spirit of contract law into a dangerous situation.Discarding the philosophical interpretation of methodology and saving ＂autonomy of will＂ by means of resetting subjects of interpretation,however,have difficulties in practice giving consideration to the beginnings and the end.The ＂autonomy of will＂ in private law judgment needs to be realized in the dimension of method of law,and judges are the only subjects of contract interpretation under the methodology.Judges have to be in the condition of judicial restraint under the restriction of source of law,discovery of law,interpretation of law and other methods of law.It＇s just this kind of restrained jurisdiction that grants ＂autonomy of will＂ the most possible living space.

关 键 词：意思自治 法律方法 法律渊源 法律发现 法律解释 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学] D916[政治法律—法学]