传达符号学与意指符号学之间的相通之处和统一关系  

On Commonalities and Unity between Semiotics of Communication and Semiotics of Signification

作　　者：张良林[1] 

机构地区：[1]常熟理工学院外国语学院,江苏常熟215500

出　　处：《外语研究》2011年第3期12-16,112,共5页Foreign Languages Research

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目"传达符号学与意指符号学比较研究"(09YJC740012);江苏省2010年度研究生科研创新计划项目"莫里斯符号学思想研究"(CX10B068R);南京师范大学2010年度优秀博士研究生学位论文培育项目(2010bs0023);江苏省"青蓝工程"资助项目

摘　　要：一些符号学家区别了传达符号学与意指符号学,不同之处主要表现在代码、对象、理论来源、发送者意图等方面。这种区别对于符号化过程和符号学研究方法的探讨确实大有裨益。然而,这种研究很容易走向极端,即只看到二者之间差异,看不到二者的统一之处。本文重点考察了传达符号学与意指符号学在符号形成过程、代码、能指所指关系、文学作品等方面的相通之处和统一关系。笔者发现,符号的传达作用与意指作用不是绝对对立的,而是处于相互依存、彼消此长、不断转换等对立统一关系之中;传达符号学与意指符号学只具方法论上的差异,而在符号学本体论上是统一的,二者紧密地交织于文化之中。Some semioticians distinguished between semiotics of communication and semiotics of signification in terms of code,object,theoretical origin and intention.This is helpful for the discussion of semiosis and semiotic approaches.However,this kind of research is also likely to go to extremes,if it sees only their differences but neglects their commonalities.The present paper discusses the relation of unity between the two in terms of semiosis,code,signifying types and literary text and so on.It concludes that the communicative function and the signifying function of signs stand not in opposition but in a relation of dialectic unity of dependency and conversion and that semiotics of communication and semiotics of signification,differing only in their methodological approaches,share some commonalities ontologically and are interwoven in culture.

关 键 词：传达符号学 意指符号学 相通之处 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]