瑞文推理测验上的性别差异  

Gender Difference on the Raven Progressive Matrices

作　　者：李春花[1] 罗献明[2] 王腾飞[1] 徐芬[3] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京100875 [2]温州医学院环境与公共卫生学院,温州325035 [3]浙江理工大学理学院,杭州310018

出　　处：《心理科学进展》2011年第7期1076-1082,共7页Advances in Psychological Science

摘　　要：瑞文推理测验上是否存在性别差异?与较早期的研究结果不同,较近的一系列研究发现在瑞文推理测验上存在性别差异,且性别差异具有发展性。当前可以解释该性别差异的观点主要有两种,其一是污染观,即认为瑞文推理测验中发现的性别差异实质上是由于测验中其他成分的"污染"所致,而在它所主要代表的g因素的发展中并不存在性别差异;其二,较新的研究提示,"污染"可能存在,但在g因素上仍然具有性别差异,这种差异是由生理上的原因造成的。研究者由此提出了智力性别差异的发展理论。本文主要从儿童青少年发展的角度回顾了有关瑞文推理测验性别差异的研究,综述并分析了关于性别差异研究结果不一致的可能原因。Was there gender difference on the Raven Progressive Matrices？ In contrast to early studies, a series of recent researches showed that gender difference did exist in Raven Progressive Matrices. And the difference varied as children develop. Ideas about how to explain this difference fall into two types： one type said that the difference was just introduced by factors other than g, g itself has no gender difference. The other type said that the difference may be contributed partly to other factors, while there is also gender difference in g factor. And the difference resulted from primarily physical difference between boys and girls, for example, maturation speed and brain size. That＇s why this difference varied with age. We discussed the potential reasons for the inconsistent conclusions on gender difference.

关 键 词：瑞文推理测验 性别差异 g因素 

分 类 号：G449[哲学宗教—心理学]