论主权财富基金的司法豁免──以《联合国国家及其财产管辖豁免公约》和《美国外国主权豁免法》为例  

On Judicial Immunity of Sovereign Wealth Funds:Taking examples of UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunity of States and Their Property and Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act

作　　者：练爽[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2011年第4期100-107,159,共8页Journal Of CUPL

摘　　要：主权财富基金在他国开展投资活动不可避免地发生纠纷甚至遭遇诉讼,而主权财富基金能否就此主张司法豁免成为一个亟待解决的问题。关于主权财富基金的管辖豁免主体资格,《联合国国家及其财产管辖豁免公约》和《美国外国主权豁免法》给出了不同的答案,在管辖豁免行为条件认定上,二者都反映了限制豁免原则的趋势认定主权财富基金从事的投资行为属于商业活动而原则上不享有管辖豁免。关于强制性措施豁免,较管辖豁免两法都规定了更为严格的条件,为主权财富基金主张强制性措施豁免提供了更多的可能。Disputes and lawsuits are inevitably caused when sovereign wealth funds are invested in other countries.It has been a burning issue that if sovereign wealth funds deserve judicial immunity or not.UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunity of States and Their Property and Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act provide different answers to its subjective qualification of jurisdictional immunity of sovereign wealth funds.But in the accreditation of the conditions of jurisdictional immunity,both of them incline to restrain it and firmly believe that the investment with sovereign wealth funds is business activities,which is free of jurisdictional immunity in principle.The immunity of judicial compulsory measures undertakes more strict requirements than jurisdictional immunity,which gives more possibilities to sovereign wealth funds for immunity of judicial compulsory measures.

关 键 词：主权财富基金 豁免 公约 外国主权豁免法 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]