“新感温病”首倡者考辨  

Textural research on the initiator of ＂new contracted warm disease＂

作　　者：陆翔[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽中医学院医史文献教研室,合肥230038

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2011年第3期161-164,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical History

基　　金：科技基础性工作专项课题：医家学术思想及诊疗经验研究-中国中医科学院资助选题团队建设项目：历代医家学术思想研究（课题编号：2009FY120301）

摘　　要：现代大多数学者认为汪机为“新感温病”的首倡者。而在汪机《伤寒选录》中并没有发现支持这些论断的充分依据，书中既没有直接提出“新感温病”的名称，也没有明显突出这一学说的陈述。经查得知，何廉臣的《重订广温热论》对汪机《伤寒选录》原文的错误引述，是将“新感温病”首倡者误判为汪机的根源，多数学者沿袭其说，竟致以讹传讹。其实早在南宋时期，郭雍即已提出“新感温病”说，汪机是“新感温病”首倡者的说法应予纠正。Most scholars of the contemporary age thought that WANG Ji was the initiator of ＂new contracted warm disease＂. But no evidence was found in Shang Han Xuan Lu to support the viewpoint. New contracted warm disease was not mentioned in the book, even without significant narratives. It is the wrong quotation of Shang Han Xuan Lu by HE Lianchen in his book Chong Ding Guang Wen Re Lun, which is the root cause of the incorrect viewpoint. Therefore, the wrong statement spread among scholars. Actually, GUO Yong had proposed the theory of ＂new contracted warm disease＂ in the Southern Song Dynasty. This wrong statement should be corrected.

关 键 词：汪机 温病学 《伤寒选录》 

分 类 号：R2[医药卫生—中医学]