从里斯本战略到“欧洲2020”战略:基于治理演进视角的分析  

From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020: An Analysis Based on the Evolution of Governance

作　　者：郑春荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学德国问题研究所/欧盟研究所

出　　处：《欧洲研究》2011年第3期81-92,160-161,共12页Chinese Journal of European Studies

基　　金：同济大学"211"三期重点建设项目"欧洲哲学与文化"(项目编号102110)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：里斯本战略的一个创新之处就在于引入了以"开放式协调法"为代表的软治理手段。然而,里斯本战略未获成功,除了因为战略设定的目标过高、过多以及缺乏重点和清晰度、透明度以外,主要被归咎于战略的治理结构过于软弱,由此产生了"实施缺口"。有鉴于此,本文分析了"欧洲2020"战略的治理手段有何改进或创新,是否从里斯本战略及其重启中吸取了经验与教训。本文结合政策学习理论指出,"欧洲2020"战略的治理手段只是工具性学习的结果,它们仍然维持在里斯本战略的软治理框架中。One innovation of the Lisbon Strategy is the introduction of the soft governance tools introduced 'Open Method of Coordination' as an example.However,the failure of the Lisbon Strategy was not only resulted from its overwhelming targets and the lack of focus,transparency,as well as a clear definition,but more importantly from the weakness of the governance structure and the 'delivery gap' caused by it.In view of the facts aforementioned,this paper analyzes the governance tools of the Europe 2020 Strategy and discusses what improvements or innovations have been made,and whether experiences and lessons have been drawn from the Lisbon Strategy and its re-launch.Based on the policy learning theory this paper concludes that the governance tools introduced by the Europe 2020 Strategy are simply the result of the instrumental learning and still confined within the soft governance framework of the Lisbon Strategy.

关 键 词：欧盟 里斯本战略“欧洲2020”战略 治理 开放式协调法 

分 类 号：F15[经济管理—世界经济]