人大个案监督与法院独立审判的矛盾性和兼容性探析  

An Analysis of Contradiction and Compatibility Between Individual Case Supervision of National People's Congress and Independent Adjudication of Courts

作　　者：刘德兴[1] 李延锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学法学院,成都610068

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期94-102,共9页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：自出现人大个案监督始,它就与法院独立审判交织在一起,在理论研究和立法实践上产生了诸多矛盾,评价褒贬参半。促进司法公正和维护人民利益是二者共同的价值追求,坚持党的领导是二者共同的根本要求,充分行使宪法赋予的权力是二者共同的改进方向,它们在"党的事业至上、人民利益至上、宪法法律至上"的框架内具有兼容性。因此,渐进地弥补二者存在的缺陷,革除二者存在的弊端,在"三个至上"方针的指引下达到平衡与契合,是解决二者矛盾的最佳选择。Since the beginning of Individual Case Supervision＇s,it has been intertwined with the judicial independence of the courts,which brought about so many contradictions in legislative practice and theory that the evaluation of it is rather controversial.To promote the interests of justice and to protect the people are the pursuit of common values of both.Adhering to the party＇s leadership is the fundamental requirement of both and to improve the exercise of constitutional rights is the direction of their common interest.The Judicial independence and Congressional Individual Case Supervision are compatibility in ＂the superiority of the leadership of the Communist Party,the superiority of the interests of the people,and the superiority of the Constitution and law＂.Therefore,the best choices to resolve conflicts between them are gradually making up for their defects,thoroughly eliminating the drawbacks and then harmoniously living under the guidance of ＂Three Supremacies＂.

关 键 词：个案监督 独立审判 司法独立 社会主义法治理念 三个至上 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]