检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李金明[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学东南亚研究中心,福建厦门361005
出 处:《南洋问题研究》2011年第2期54-62,80,共10页Southeast Asian Affairs
基 金:中国海洋发展研究中心重点项目"中国南海断续国界线的法律地位研究"(AOCZD200903)
摘 要:近年来,国内外学者有关南海断续线法律地位的研究,大抵集中在"历史性水域"、"历史性权利"、"海上疆域线"和"岛屿归属线"4个方面。本文通过对这4个方面的研究进行评述,认为无论从断续线产生时的历史背景,或者从目前中国政府发布的有关声明来看,把断续线的法律地位定为"岛屿归属线"还是比较符合实际,可以认可的。In recent years, reviews of scholars both at home and abroad on the legal status of the U-shaped line in the South China Sea have focused mostly on the following four aspects: "historical waters," "historical title," "maritime boundary line," and ,lisland attribution line. " As an overview of reviews of these four aspects, this article holds that regarding the legal status of the U-shaped line as an "island attribution line" is more realistic and acceptable no matter whether judging from the historical background of the creation of the U-shaped line or from the related declarations released by Chinese government at present.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.228