检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴新星[1]
出 处:《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第2期40-43,共4页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:多年以来,我国的行政体制改革未能从内在机理上挖掘改革的动力,以此保证改革的效率和效用。内在动力的不足、改革本身制度的缺失、改革成本分摊不均、行政伦理失范等问题是长期困扰我国行政体制改革的障碍。宪政经济学采用个人理性选择的视角,对规则的选择和规则下选择的分析给予了行政体制改革诸多启示。对行政体制改革困境的突破关键在于对改革进行立宪选择的约束,尊重利益主体的改革需求,加强伦理道德动力挖掘,以此构建行政体制改革的动力机制,推动行政体制改革的顺利和有效开展。Constitutional economics is a science depending on normative research. But its theories about methodological individualism, rational choice; the choices in constitutional level and operational level provide a lot of inspiration for the reform of administrative institutions. From the perspective of constitutional economics, the lack of internal dynamic, the legal loophole in constitutional level, the disequilibrium of cost of reform and the ethical anomie are predicaments for the reform of administrative institutions. This essay holds that the reform should respect the demands of all subjects in the reform, rule the reform in the constitutional level and develop the moral education. From these aspects, we could reconstruct the power system to further promote the reform of the administrative system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170