TRIPS-plus扩张情势下非违反之诉在TRIPS协议中的适用探析  

Study on the Utility of Non-violation Disputes under the Proliferation of TRIPS-plus Agreements

作　　者：杨静[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学法学院,云南昆明650221

出　　处：《世界贸易组织动态与研究（上海对外贸易学院学报）》2011年第4期26-33,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金"自由贸易协定中的知识产权问题及我国的对策"(09XFX035)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：后TRIPS时代TRIPS-plus强势扩张,其适用的效果加速了高标准知识产权保护规范的全球化,形成了知识产权保护的棘轮效应,又缩减了发展中国家利用TRIPS协议弹性条款的自由选择空间,对发展中国家造成诸多不利影响。非违反之诉如能适用于TRIPS,有助于重申和发扬协议的利益平衡精神,匡正TRIPS-plus条款。发展中国家可以重新考虑TRIPS协议下非违反之诉的适用问题,在规则细化完善的基础上,将其作为一种极好的防御措施来应对不断升温的TRIPS-plus扩张压力,使之成为维护自身合法权益的武器。The post-TRIPS era has witnessed a proliferation of TRIPS-plus FTAs. The application of these agreements results in accelerating the globalization of strict intellectual property protection, forming global intellectual property ratcheting process, and curtailing domestic policy space for WTO developing country members under TRIPS Agreement＇s flexibility. These TRIPS-plus standards have undermined the benefits of developing countries. If non-violation complaints were available for TRIPS disputes, it would help to reconfirm and develop the idea of balance, reframe the TRIPS-plus provisions. Developing countries may reconsider whether the non-violation complaints should be available under TRIPS Agreement. The non-violation procedure, with proper and detailed rules governing it, could very well provide the necessary defense to the growing pressures to proliferate the TRIPS-plus agreements. So developing countries can use it as an effective mechanism to defend their legitimate interests.

关 键 词：争端解决 TRIPS协议 TRIPS-PLUS 利益平衡 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]